Презентация на тему Lecture 5 Categories and types of present-day English and Ukrainian word-formation (part 2)

Ukrainian
word-formation (part 2)

Contrast is the occurance
of different elements

to create interest

with old words

Ralph Waldo Emerson (1849)

1.1. Formal characteristics

1.2.The treatment of compounds.
1.3. Types of compounds
2 .Contrastive analysis of noun compounds in English and Ukrainian
2.1. Suggested classification in terms of syntactic paraphrase
2.2. “Bahuvrihi” compounds
2.3. Reduplicatives

in English and in Ukrainian
is characterized by the

ease with which compound words are formed when need arises without becoming permanent units of the vocabulary
should be studied both diachronically and synchronically
TASKS:
1). The principal features of compounds which distinguish them from other linguistic units.
2). The semantic structure of compound words.
3). The principles of classification.

more than one stem and functioning both grammatically and

semantically as a single word. I.V.Arnold states that these stems occur in English as free forms.
In Ukrainian compounding is subdivided into
1. Stem-combining with the help of interfixes о, е (доброзичливий, працездатний) or without them (триповерховий, всюдихiд);
2. Word-combining or juxtaposition (Lat. juxta - near, positio - place) - combining several words or word-forms in one complex word (хата-лабораторiя, салон-перукарня)

number of bases may be involved, but in English

except for a relatively minor class of items (normally abbreviated) compounds usually comprise two stems only, however internally complex each may be.
Compounding can take place within any of the word classes, but with very few exceptions, the resulting compound word in English is a noun, a verb or an adjective. In Ukrainian this list includes nouns, adjectives and adverbs.

and integrity of a compound may depend upon:
unity

of stress,
solid or hyphanated spelling,
semantic unity,
unity of morphological and syntactic functioning
or, more often, upon the combined effect of several of these factors

compound words:
the closed form, in which the words are melded

together, such as firefly, secondhand, softball, childlike, crosstown, redhead, keyboard, makeup, notebook;
the hyphenated form, such as daughter-in-law, master-at-arms, over-the-counter, six-pack, six-year-old, mass-produced;
and the open form, such as post office, real estate, middle class, full moon, half sister, attorney general.

confusion. The New York Public Library's Writer's Guide points out that

an old-furniture salesman clearly deals in old furniture, but an old furniture salesman would be an old man.
We probably would not have the same ambiguity, however, about a used car dealer. When compounded modifiers precede a noun, they are often hyphenated: part-time teacher, fifty-yard-wide field, fire-resistant curtains, high-speed chase. When those same modifying words come after the noun they are not hyphenated: a field fifty yards wide, curtains that are fire resistant, etc

of a compound we should examine the relations of

the members to each other.
Compounding associates stems drawn from the whole lexicon in a wide range of semantic relations. Although both bases in a compound are in principle equally open, they are normally in a relation whereby the first is modifying the second.
In short, compounding can in general be viewed as prefixation with open-class items. (A Comprehensive grammar, p. 1568)

that a compound can be formed by placing any

lexical item in front of another. The relations between items brought together in compounding must be such that it is reasonable and useful to classify the second element in terms of the first. Such compounds are called endocentric.
In exocentric compounds there is no semantic centre as in scarecrow (figure of a man in old clothes set up to scare birds away from crops). Only the combination of both elements names the referent.

idiomatic in its character, so that the meaning of

the whole is not a mere sum of its elements and the compound is often very different in meaning from a corresponding syntactic group.
e.g. a blackboard - a black board.
In some cases the original motivation of the idiomatic compound cannot be easily re-created.
e.g. blackmail -getting money or some other profit from a person by threats.

in terms of syntactic relations. Such mode of presentation

which (where possible) links compounds to sentential or clausal paraphrases is adopted by A Comprehensive Grammar, H.Marchand.
As an example of this approach we may take the two compounds: daydreaming and sightseeing which can be analyzed in terms of their sentential analogues:
X dreams during the day, i.e. verb + adverbial
X sees sights, i.e. verb + object

: вода спадає – водоспад this type is represented

by the following ways of combining of structural components:
noun (subject) + deverbal noun e.g.
English: sunrise, rainfall, headache, bee-sting, frostbite, daybreak, heartbeat, rainfall
Ukrainian: небосхил, серцебиття, зорепад, сонцестояння, снігопад
This type is rather productive in both contrasted languages.

(subject)
In English we refer to this type those compounds

where the first component is a verbal noun in –ing, e.g, flying machine, firing squad, investigating committee and it is very productive. In Ukrainian examples are few: падолист (арх.), трясогузка.
verb + noun (subject)
This type can be found only in English: watchdog, playboy.

дорогу – дороговказ
noun (object) + deverbal noun
This is a

moderately productive type in English but very common in Ukrainian, e.g.
English: birth-control, handshake. Ukrainian: душогуб, сінокіс, гречкосій, родовід.
In Eng. we can single out a subtype noun (object) + verbal noun in – ing: book-keeping, town-planning. In Ukr. compounds of that subtype correspond to compounds in –ння: сироваріння, містобудування.

noun
In English this is a very productive type and

designates concrete (usually human) agents: mathmaker, stockholder, hairsplitter. Note, however, dishwasher, lawn-mover. All compounds of this type in English are nouns with –er suffix. As in Ukrainian there is a wide range of suffixes forming agent nouns, so examples of compounds reflect this diversity: м’ясорубка, законодавець, користолюбець,квартиронаймач, містобудівник.

call-girl, push-button, drawbridge. In Ukr. the first component of

these compounds is a verb in imperative: голиборода, крути- вус, пройдисвіт, дурисвіт. This type is often encountered in plant-names as дери- літ, ломикамінь, ломиніс and for poetic characterization of people as Вернигора, Перетанцюйбіс, Непийвода. This type of compounds belongs to the ancient layer of Ukr. vocabulary, for example, the God of Sun in ancient Ukrainian religion was named Дажбог : imperative form of the verb dadjú – дай and noun bogú – щастя, добробут.

пішки – пішохід.
In English this type of noun compounds

has the following subtypes:
verbal noun in – ing + noun (adverbial component which can be transformed into prepositional phrase), e.g. writing-desk (write at a desk), hiding place (hide in a place), walking stick (walk with a stick).
noun (adverbial component) + agent noun,e.g. city-dweller (dwell in the city), baby sitter (sit with the baby)

+ verbal noun in –ing, sunbathing (bathe in the

sun), handwriting (write by hand),
noun (adverbial component) + noun (converted from verb), homework (work at home), gunfight (fight with a gun).
In Eng. the 2) and the 4) subtypes can actually be combined and this combined type occurs in Ukr.: місцеперебування, праце-здатність, світогляд. Besides, In Ukr. there exists another productive type of compounds formation: adverb (adverbial component) + deverbal noun, e.g. скоропис, марнослів’я, пішохід.

and in Ukr. with syntactic paraphrase as tertium comparationis

reveals both isomorphic and allomorphic features in contrasted languages.

(noun1 has noun2),
raindrop, скловата
(noun1 is of, consists of

noun2),
ashtray, птахоферма, зерносховище
(noun2 is for noun1),
girlfriend, лісосмуга
(noun2 is noun1),
security officer
(noun2 controls/works in connection with noun1)

noun2 (noun1 powers/operates noun2 “the wind powers the mill”).

e.g.: air-brake, steam engine, gas cooker.
[B] TOY FACTORY : noun1 + noun2 (noun2 produces/yields noun1, “the factory produces toys”). e.g.: honey-bee, silkworm, gold mine
Ukrainian: шовкопряд, нафтопромисел
[C] BLOODSTAIN: noun1 + noun2 (noun1 produces/yields noun2, “the blood produces stains”). e.g.: hay fever, tortoise-shell, whalebone, food poisoning.

+ noun2 (noun1 has noun2 “the door has a

knob”). This is a very productive type. Noun is inanimate. With animate nouns we use a noncompound genitive phrase: compare the table leg with the boy’s leg. e.g.: window-pane, cartwheel, bedpost.

+ noun2 (noun2 controls/works in connection with noun1 “The

officer looks after security”). e.g.: chairperson, fireman, deckhand. This is a very productive type, with the second constituent always a human agent. Indeed, so commonly has man been thus used (in its unmarked gender role, “human adult”) that in some compounds it has a reduced vowel /men/. This item and its gender-free alternative person might be viewed as a suffix. In Ukrainian terminology some final elements of compounds are called suffixoids : -грiйка, думець, -лов. e.g.: тiлогрiйка, однодумець, птахолов.

noun2 (= noun2 in respect of noun1) “the analysis

of the psyche”. This is a highly productive type both in Ukrainian and in English.
Various relations can be involved. Typically the first constituent does not occur as a separate noun stem, but the model has been widely imitated with common stems, with an infix (usually -o- but often -i-) as a link between the two parts: cryptography, insecticide, etc.

stress often falls on the link vowel of the

combining form. Among common second constituents are -meter,-graph(y), -gram, -logy. In Ukrainian: -метр(iя), -граф(iя), -лог(iя), -ман(iя). The formations are especially in the fields of science and learning. In consequence, many are in international currency, adopted or adapted in numerous languages.

pattern of formation but to the relation such compounds

have with their referents.
Neither constituent refers to the entity named but, the whole refers to a separate entity (usually a person) that is claimed to be characterized by the compound, in its literal or figurative meaning.

basis of the facetious claim that people of intellectual

interest and cultivated tastes are likely to have a lofty expanse of forehead.
Many bahuvrihi compounds are somewhat disparaging (зневажливий) in tone and are used chiefly in informal style. They are formed on one or other of the patterns already described.
e.g: birdbrain, egghead, hardback, loudmouth, blockhead, butterfingers, featherweight.
Ukrainian: твердолобий, криворукий.

a particularly productive type of back-formation relates to the

noun compounds in -ing and -er. For example, the verbs: sleep-walk, house-keep, dry-clean, sight-see.

are either identical or only slightly different,e.g. goody-goody (a

self-consciously virtuous person, informal). The difference between the two constituents may be in the intial consonants, as in walkie-talkie, or in the medial vowels, e.g. criss-cross. Most of the reduplicatives are highly informal or familiar, and many belong to the sphere of child-parent talk, e.g. din-din (dinner).

‘jingles’) are:
[i] to imitate sounds, e.g. rat-a-tat [knocking on

door], tick-tock [of clock],
ha-ha [of laughter], bow-wow [of dog] 
[ii] to suggest alternating movements, e.g. seesaw, flip-flop, ping- pong.
[iii] to disparage by suggesting instability, nonsense, insincerity, vacillation (вагання) etc.: higgledy-piggledy, hocus-pocus, wishy-washy, dilly-dally, shilly-shally.
[iv] to intensify, e.g. teeny-weeny, tip-top.