Слайд 2
Cataloguing and retroconversion:
what do we need to
know as a community ?
Patricia Methven
Слайд 3
Origins of this paper
JISC/RLUK Resource Discovery Taskforce
London Library
“Retrospective Cataloguing, or, The ‘forgotten projects’ ” survey supported
by RLUK/MIMAS
A visceral response to the survey
Слайд 4
The visceral response
seemed oddly targeted
questions likely to evoke
information that did not offer comparable evidence for the
archives sector
an emphasis on retroconversion begged the question about the extent of uncatalogued material
insufficient evidence of awareness of aggregators in use in the sector: AIM25,A2A,HUB,Archive Wales,SCAN
didn’t address the growth of digital archives
didn’t address digital access to surrogates sufficiently.
Слайд 5
Why did RULK/JISC want the information ?
- resource
discovery
1997: ‘Making the
most of our libraries’ suggested 50
million records awaited retroconversion.
1999-2002: £30 million allocated to RSLP, 14 million items covered.
2007: RIN study (library/researcher consultation) suggested 50% of research collections still hidden.
Слайд 6
Opening your mouth and .....
Lesley Richmond, I and
doubtless others made our views felt
New survey document aimed
at HE encouraged by RLUK
Discussed at UKAD Steering Committee as potentially applicable and useful more widely
Слайд 7
Opening the Treasury
scope ?
scale of work ?
should we/can
we do it now ?
Слайд 8
Timely ? (1)
Aggregators have come of age and
considering next steps.
Significant advances in how we can and
offer access to data
Renewed appetite for information on which to build strategy for discovery and data management.
Слайд 9
Timely ? (2)
Renewed driver in research communities to
open up their data (as well as publications) for
research driven by Open Access agenda.
Library communities seeking a role.
Wider shared services agenda.
Impact of the recession.
Слайд 10
How much of our archives are catalogued ?
fond/collections
series
piece
Measured by linear metres or number of boxes.
Слайд 11
How well are holdings catalogued/recorded ?
accession record
box list
fonds – extended ISAD (G) e.g Archives Hub/AIM25
detailed list
Extents ?
Слайд 12
How standards based ?
Use of what for
what ?
NCA Name Authority Rules
UKAT
Library of Congress subject headings
ISAAR
(CPF)
EAC
MARC AMC
?
Extents ?
Слайд 13
Format of the catalogues ?
hard copy
word processed/spreadsheets only
PDFs
only
CALM/ADLIB/other proprietary
custom design software
embedded in library/museum catalogues
Extents ?
Слайд 14
Extent of record enhancement
indexed/thesaurus support for fonds description
indexing
of detail catalogues
Addition of community generated content to catalogue
entry?
Слайд 15
Online accessibility of catalogues (1)
within the institution only
exposed
by institution through Google
available via national/regional portals (e.g SCAN,Archives
Wales,AIM25,Hub,A2A)
Extents?
Слайд 16
On line accessibility of catalogues (2)
crosswalk software with
library/museums within institutions
more broadly (PRIMO,Worldcat Local,etc)
use of semantic web
techniques
Linked data
Слайд 17
Enrichment of online access (1)
catalogue links to individual
surrogates
full digital databases themed or whole collections
contribution of digital
surrogates to externally hosted sites
online exhibitions/focused articles
content provision to Virtual Learning Environments
Слайд 18
Enrichment of online access (2)
provision of image galleries
offer
flikr
offer RSS feeds/Twitter etc