Что такое findslide.org?

FindSlide.org - это сайт презентаций, докладов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint.


Для правообладателей

Обратная связь

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Яндекс.Метрика

Презентация на тему Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods

IntroductionJunction flow occurs when a boundary layer encounters an obstructionAt realistic large Reynolds number, the adverse pressure gradient in the streamwise direction imposed by the wing often causes the upwind boundary layer on the body to
Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methodsAuthors: Song Fu *, IntroductionJunction flow occurs when a boundary layer encounters an obstructionAt realistic large Viewed objectsRood wing-body junction (3:2 elliptical nose and a NACA 0020 tail Numerical methods. Flow equationsThe computations here are all based on a compressible Numerical methods. Energy and dissipation equationsUsing the LU-SGS methodThe production terms are Results. Rood Boundary conditions:at x/T = -18.24: inlet (from experiment)at x/T = Difference between SST and WD+Comparisons on U and k with the WD+ and SST Difference on gridComparisons on U/Uref and k/U2ref based on two grids Flowfields on the symmetric planeComparison of velocity vectors on the symmetric plane Flow structures at three streamwise positionsTransverse velocity at different streamwise positions (maximum Flow structures at three streamwise positionsFlow patterns around the wing-body junction (a) Flow structures at three streamwise positionsComparisons of turbulent kinetic energy and cross-streamwise Flowfields in the wakeComparisons of turbulent kinetic energy and the vertical flow Results. TN D-712 junctionGrids around TN D-712 Wing-fuselage junction. Mach number - 0.9Reynolds number is 7.5 · 106 (based on halfspan) Pressure coefficientsComparisons of pressure coefficients of different turbulence methods near the junction Vortex over the wingComparison on vortex over the wing with RANS, DES and DDES methods. The instantaneous DDES vorticities over the wing at different AoAs (Left: 12.5; Right: 26.2) Flow patterns of DDESTransverse flow structure at different streamwise positions by DDES. ConclusionWeakly nonlinear correction k–x model (WD+) can effectively predict the flows past
Слайды презентации

Слайд 2 Introduction
Junction flow occurs when a boundary layer encounters

IntroductionJunction flow occurs when a boundary layer encounters an obstructionAt realistic

an obstruction
At realistic large Reynolds number, the adverse pressure

gradient in the streamwise direction imposed by the wing often causes the upwind boundary layer on the body to separate and form multiple horseshoe vortices around the wing
Better understanding and accurate prediction of the junction flows can effectively help the design of lower drag and high-efficiency flight vehicles

Слайд 3 Viewed objects
Rood wing-body junction (3:2 elliptical nose and

Viewed objectsRood wing-body junction (3:2 elliptical nose and a NACA 0020

a NACA 0020 tail model) – have experimental results
NASA

TN D-712 – has interference flows at high angles of attack with a low-Re two-equation k–g model which requires no parameterization of the distance to the wall

Слайд 4 Numerical methods. Flow equations
The computations here are all

Numerical methods. Flow equationsThe computations here are all based on a

based on a compressible solver using a Roe flux-difference

splitting scheme with a 3rd order monotone upstream scheme
A modified fully implicit lower–upper symmetric Gaussian Seidel (LUSGS, Yoon and Jameson, 1987; Xiao et al., 2006) model with Newton-like sub-iteration in pseudo time is taken as the time marching method when solving the mean flow and the turbulence model equations
Global non-dimensional time stepping is implemented to capture the unsteady properties of the separation flows

Слайд 5 Numerical methods. Energy and dissipation equations
Using the LU-SGS

Numerical methods. Energy and dissipation equationsUsing the LU-SGS methodThe production terms

method
The production terms are treated explicitly, lagged in time

while the dissipation and diffusion terms are treated implicitly
The advective terms are discretized using second order upwind scheme. The diffusive terms are discretized using a second-order central scheme.

Слайд 6 Results. Rood
Boundary conditions:
at x/T = -18.24: inlet

Results. Rood Boundary conditions:at x/T = -18.24: inlet (from experiment)at x/T

(from experiment)
at x/T = 16: outflow (zero streamwise gradients)
at

y/T = 0, y/T = 7 and z/T = 3: symmetric
at z/T = 0: wall (no-slip)


Слайд 7 Difference between SST and WD+
Comparisons on U and

Difference between SST and WD+Comparisons on U and k with the WD+ and SST

k with the WD+ and SST


Слайд 8 Difference on grid
Comparisons on U/Uref and k/U2ref based

Difference on gridComparisons on U/Uref and k/U2ref based on two grids

on two grids


Слайд 9 Flowfields on the symmetric plane
Comparison of velocity vectors

Flowfields on the symmetric planeComparison of velocity vectors on the symmetric plane

on the symmetric plane


Слайд 10 Flow structures at three streamwise positions
Transverse velocity at

Flow structures at three streamwise positionsTransverse velocity at different streamwise positions

different streamwise positions (maximum thickness, middle and trailing edge

of the wing)

Слайд 11 Flow structures at three streamwise positions
Flow patterns around

Flow structures at three streamwise positionsFlow patterns around the wing-body junction

the wing-body junction (a) shear stress lines and vortex

in the wake; (b) upwind symmetry plane horseshoe vortex and (c) vortices near the trailing edge

Слайд 12 Flow structures at three streamwise positions
Comparisons of turbulent

Flow structures at three streamwise positionsComparisons of turbulent kinetic energy and

kinetic energy and cross-streamwise normal stress near the trailing

edge (x/T = 3.95)

Слайд 13 Flowfields in the wake
Comparisons of turbulent kinetic energy

Flowfields in the wakeComparisons of turbulent kinetic energy and the vertical

and the vertical flow vectors in the wake (x/T

= 6.38)

Слайд 14 Results. TN D-712 junction
Grids around TN D-712 Wing-fuselage

Results. TN D-712 junctionGrids around TN D-712 Wing-fuselage junction.

junction.


Слайд 15 Mach number - 0.9
Reynolds number is 7.5 ·

Mach number - 0.9Reynolds number is 7.5 · 106 (based on

106 (based on halfspan)
Angle of attack is 12.5o
Computation

parameters

Слайд 16 Pressure coefficients
Comparisons of pressure coefficients of different turbulence

Pressure coefficientsComparisons of pressure coefficients of different turbulence methods near the junction

methods near the junction


Слайд 17 Vortex over the wing
Comparison on vortex over the

Vortex over the wingComparison on vortex over the wing with RANS, DES and DDES methods.

wing with RANS, DES and DDES methods.


Слайд 18
The instantaneous DDES vorticities over the wing at

The instantaneous DDES vorticities over the wing at different AoAs (Left: 12.5; Right: 26.2)

different AoAs (Left: 12.5; Right: 26.2)


Слайд 19 Flow patterns of DDES
Transverse flow structure at different

Flow patterns of DDESTransverse flow structure at different streamwise positions by

streamwise positions by DDES. 2x/B = 1.667, 1.833, 2.167

and 2.500.

  • Имя файла: simulation-of-wing-body-junction-flows-with-hybrid-ransles-methods.pptx
  • Количество просмотров: 87
  • Количество скачиваний: 0