Презентация на тему Contemporary HRM. Diversity

work may be pursued – equal opportunities/ diversity approaches

To outline some of the key debates and issues surrounding diversity

diversity within the workplace?

WERS– Equality and Diversity Section
51% of employees are female
Workers

aged 50 or over account for 24% of employees up 20% from 2004 WERS
Disabled workers account for 2% of all employees up 1%
Workers belonging to non-white ethnic group comprise 9% of all employees
10% of employees are non-UK nationals
Men earn more than women (£578 per week v. £480 per week) gap is reducing..slowly

approach or Equal Treatment approach
This approach supports legislative action.

Legal framework, if used effectively, is sufficient for alleviating discrimination. Positive action
2. Managing Diversity approaches
Legislation is not enough. Attempt to change attitudes, preconceptions and eradicate stereotypes and prejudice. People are valued as individuals.
3. Radical approach or Equal Outcomes approach
Positive or reverse discrimination necessary - need to create level playing field. Lawful in US but unlawful in the UK

by external forces.
Legally driven (reactive).
concentrates on issues of discrimination

(problem focused).
is seen as an issue for minority groups – race, gender, disability.
Quantitative focus… numbers of X and Y in organisations.
Is seen as being a ‘personnel issue’ (operational).

less favourably than another person because of a protected

characteristic they have or are thought to have (see Perceptive Discrimination below), or because they associate with someone who has a protected characteristic (see Associative Discrimination below).

Associative Discrimination
This already applies to Race, Religion or Belief and Sexual Orientation. It is now extended to cover Age, Disability, Gender Reassignment and Sex. This is direct discrimination against someone because they associate with another person who possesses a protected characteristic.

Perceptive Discrimination
This already applies to Age, Race, Religion or Belief and Sexual Orientation. It is now extended to cover Disability, Gender Reassignment and Sex. This is direct discrimination against an individual because others think they possess a particular protected characteristic. It applies even if the person does not actually possess the characteristic.

Indirect Discrimination
This already applies to Age, Race, Religion or Belief, Sex, Sexual Orientation and Marriage and Civil Partnership. It is now extended to cover Disability and Gender Reassignment.
Indirect Discrimination can occur when you have a condition, rule, policy or even a practice in your organisation that applies to everyone but particularly disadvantages people who share a protected characteristic.

protected characteristic, which has the purpose or effect of

violating an individual's dignity or creating intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that individual".
Employees will now be able to complain of behaviour that they find offensive even if it is not directed at them, and the complainant need not possess the relevant characteristic themselves. Employees are also protected from harassment because of perception and association.

Third Party Harassment
This already applies to Sex. It is now expected to cover Age, Disability, Gender Reassignment, Race, Religion or Belief and Sexual Orientation.
The Equality Act makes you potentially liable for harassment of your employees by people (third parties) who are not employees of your company, such as customers or clients.

Victimisation
Victimisation occurs when an employee is treated badly because they have made or supported a complaint or raised a grievance under the Equality Act; or because they are suspected of doing so. The Equality Act amends the definition 'victimisation', so that no longer needs to point to a comparator.

policy statements
Carrying out audits to ensure that a policy

works
Reviewing current H.R. policies to ensure they are free of bias
Developing a programme of necessary corrective action followed by the application of appropriate monitoring procedures

Definitions
Statement of the organisation’s commitment to equal opportunities
Name(s) of

the employee responsible for policy
Details of structure for implementing the policy
An obligation upon employees to respect and act in accordance with the policy
Procedures for dealing with complaints of discrimination
Examples of unlawful practices
Details of monitoring and review procedures
A commitment to remove barriers to equal opportunity
(EOC April, 2005)

to the systematic and planned commitment on the part

of organisations to recruit and retain employees from diverse demographic backgrounds’, Thomas (1992), cited in Redman and Wilkinson (2009:343).
Builds on the idea that differences between groups should be recognised and valued
Development of diversity located within the context of shifting demographic trends

opportunities laws and policies
Equal opportunities (EO) needed to be

business driven
EO seen to be negative and compliance driven
Diversity – positive approach not focused on disadvantage groups, but whole of workforce – an inclusive approach
Diversity focuses on the business case for EO

CIPD argues that the management of diversity:

‘…develops &

complements established approaches to equal opportunities. It offers an opportunity for organisations to develop a workforce to meet their business goals & to improve approaches to customer care… it builds on the understanding of the need for equal opportunity policies. Because of its systematic approach, it fits well with initiatives such as ‘Investors in People’ & ‘total quality.’

by external forces.
Legally driven (reactive).
concentrates on issues of discrimination

(problem focused).
is seen as an issue for minority groups – race, gender, disability.
Quantitative focus… numbers of X and Y in organisations.
is seen as being a ‘personnel issue’ (operational).

Managing Diversity:
Driven by Internal forces.
is seen as concentrating on meeting business objectives (strategic).
is seen as ensuring ALL employees maximise their potential & contribution (proactive).
is seen as being the concern of ALL employees especially line mgrs.
Qualitative focus…improving the environment (culture) in organisations.

recruit and retain best talent – 64%
Corporate Social Responsibility

- 62%
To be an employer of choice- 62%
Because it makes business sense – 60%
(but only 17% ranked ‘most important’)
Because it is morally right – 60%
To improve business performance – 48%
(CIPD, 2006)

and retain the best talent – 64%
Because it makes

business sense – 60%
To improve business performance – 48%

Many companies are failing to consider the different ways in which diversity can add value to business…
e.g. creativity and innovation; improve products and services; reach diverse markets; improve corporate branding; respond to competition etc.

2003:187)
Organisational Inputs:
cultural awareness and sensitivity training programmes
Knowledge expansion

vs behavioural change

Organisational Outcomes:
Efficacious recruitment and improved retention
Cost reduction in turnover and absence costs
Creativity and flexibility
Enhanced customer service and sales to minority groups
Competitive advantage
Corporate image
Organisational survival

Organisational Culture:
Essential to managing Diversity
MD is “a complete organisational cultural change designed to foster appreciation of demographic ethic and individual differences” (Gilbert et al, 1999; p61)

only be valued so long as it contributes to

profit or organisational objectives (a tool of management control? – Kirkby and Harter, 2001)
the persistence of the ‘white’, heterosexual, non-disabled, male norm
with shift in emphasis from social groups to a focus on individuals, MD does not have collective force of disadvantaged groups behind it – commodification of people for business gain! (Kirkby and Harter, 2001)
all ‘differences’ could potentially be viewed on the same terms
people may wish to be treated both the ‘same’ and ‘differently’
the dominant group know you are different and continue to treat you as different, but if you yourself specify your difference, your claim to equality will be null
(Cockburn, 1991; Liff, 1996; Webb, 1997)

equality at work is to avoid unfair discrimination
EO emphasises

the moral argument for equal treatment whereas MD highlights the business case
unfair discrimination often results from group stereotyping rather than individual assessment
legislation can have only a limited effect in reducing the level of unfair discrimination
changes in practice relating to equalising opportunity are happening very slowly
EO approaches & MD may be viewed not as alternatives but as complementary approaches
There is a need to monitor and measure equality/diversity outcomes in organisations.

Torrington et al (2017)

work and life
Problem: equilibrium suggests that work and non-work

life are separate – argued they are entwined and if there is an imbalance in one potentially there will be stress and ill-health experienced by an individual

“WLB is about individuals being able to run their working lives and non-work lives without pressure from one detracting from the other” (Noon and Blyton, 2007; cited in Beardwell and Claydon, 2010:149)

nature demographic of labour markets – increase of females,

ageing population

Developing information and communication technologies

24/7 consumer culture

Legislation

Retention of talented staff

Source: Redman and Wilkinson (2009)

could cause trouble for core work requirements

Blurring of boundaries

between work and personal life due to increased communication/technology

Appraisal systems and individual incentives that blur the lines between work and home life

characterized by increasing dynamism and competition. In such a

case, sustainable fit can be achieved only by developing a flexible organisation. Thus, strategic HRM must increasingly promote organizational flexibility in order for the firm to achieve a dynamic fit” (Schuler & Jackson, 1999)

“The ability of the organisation to adapt the size, composition, responsiveness and cost of the people inputs required to achieve organisational objectives” (Pilbeam and Corbridge, 2006)

Developing a well trained & flexible workforce thus contributing to the organisation’s ability to adapt to an uncertain & changing environment; improving the utilisation of people by introducing more flexible systems of work (Armstrong, 2001)

types of flexibility:

Numerical: a firm’s ability to adjust the

level of labour inputs to meet fluctuations in output
Functional: a firm’s ability to adjust & deploy the skills of its employees to match the tasks required by its changing workforce, production methods and/or technology
Temporal: Allows adjustments to time – i.e. working day or working year
Financial: support for the achievement of flexibility through the firm’s pay & reward structures

There are others, see Pilbeam and Corbridge (2013), e.g.
Distancing: Achieved through better use of technology

swapping
Unpaid leave
Unpaid sabbaticals
Working from home
Informal flexibility

motivation
Increase levels of satisfaction
Improve productivity and performance
Retain talented staff

who would have left – reduce turnover
Attract staff to the organisation (employer branding)

Employee’s perspective

Enhanced commitment to the organisation
Motivation and engagement levels increased due to effective balance between work-life priorities
Feeling valued by their organisation

Adapted from Torrington et al. (2008) and Wilton (2013)

of approaches
Inconsistency in relying on employees (especially if they

are working more/less than required)
High work loads can make it impossible

Employee’s perspective

Damage to career progression
Part-time workers – working more hours than contracted
Seen as a lack of commitment to the organisation
Individual needs to find flexible solutions when requesting the right to flexible working