Что такое findslide.org?

FindSlide.org - это сайт презентаций, докладов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint.


Для правообладателей

Обратная связь

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Яндекс.Метрика

Презентация на тему Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Содержание

Gastric cancer is a significant global health problem. Recent data indicate that 1.4 million new cases of gastroesophageal and gastric cancer are diagnosed annually, and 1.1 million deaths
Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Gastric Cancer Semenisty V. MD Gastric cancer is a significant global health problem. Advanced disease- aim of treatment Prolong survival/progression free survivalPalliation/symptom control Improve/preserve quality of life (QoL) Single Agents Active in Gastric Cancer5-fluorouracil (UFT,Capecitabine)S1CisplatinDoxorubicin/EpirubicinPaclitaxel DocetaxelIrinotecanVan De Velde, Kelsen D…Gastric cancer.2008 Combination Regimens vs. Best Supportive CareSmall studies4 trials showing improved survival of Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Effect of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC) on overall survival Effect of combination versus single-agent chemotherapy on overall survivalDoxorubiciSA Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/cisplatin combinations (without anthracyclines) Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/anthracycline combinations (without cisplatin) ToxicityPELF; 184 patients :  cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin, and FU bolusECF; 327 Outcomes From Phase III Trials Reference protocolECFCF	    Cisplatin/5-FU (CF) and ECF (epirubicin plus CF) Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, CPT-11 plus Cisplatin in patients with advanced, untreated gastric or IF vs. CF  phase III, 337 pts Dank et. al, Ann Dank et al, ASCO 2005 IF vs. CF Potential alternative therapy Taxotere    Final results of a randomized controlled phase III TAX 325 Arm AD 75mg/m2 D1C 75mg/m2 D1F 750mg/m2 CIVI D1-5cycles TAX 325   Median survival, 9.2 v 8.6 month Initially:  Docetaxel - 50 mg/m2 Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 2x2 randomized study comparing ECF to   alternative regimens substituting Oxaliplatin REAL-2 The 2x2 comparisons primarily compared the fluoropyridine-containing arms (ECF + EOF REAL-2     For the fluoropyrimidine comparison of  5-FU REAL-2     For the platinum comparison of cisplatin versus REAL-2 conclusioncapecitabine is not inferior to 5-FU and oxaliplatin is not inferior n engl j med 358;1 www.nejm.38 org january 3, 2008Capecitabine and oxaliplatin Metastatic disease ongoing phase III trials: United States: HER2 positive gastric cancer:   ToGA trial is an ongoing Phase ToGA trial designHER2-positive advanced GC  (n=584)5-FU or capecitabinea  + cisplatin(n=290)R5-FU Treatment regimensCapecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14 q3w x 65-fluorouracil  800 mg/m2/day ToGA Endpoints:Primary:   overall survivalSecondary: progression-free survival PFS Results   Median OS was significantly improved with H+CT compared to Primary end point: OSTime (months)2942902772662462232091851731431471171139090647147563243243016211413712665401000No.  at risk11.113.80.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0024681012141618202224262830323436EventFC + HFCCI, confidence interval; Efficacy: OS by HER2 statusSubgroupMedian OS   (months)All11.113.8vsPre-planned analysis  IHC0/FISH+IHC1+/FISH+IHC2+/FISH+IHC3+/FISH+IHC3+/FISH-7.210.210.812.317.710.68.712.317.917.5Exploratory ConclusionsTrastuzumab is the first biological agent to  show a survival benefit Avastin…  Multicenter Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in 47 patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were Cetuximab …Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in patients Cetuximab …Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and docetaxel Cetuximab …EXPAND (Phase III)Cetuximab (Erbitux) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda, X) and Second line therapy Second-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic gastric Median TTP - 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.1) Median OS  - Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: who may benefit? V Catalano, ConclusionNo dramatic improvement with new studies.DCF with slight improvement, but increased toxicityIF Thank you!
Слайды презентации

Слайд 2 Gastric cancer is a significant

Gastric cancer is a significant global health problem.

global health problem. Recent data indicate

that 1.4 million new cases of gastroesophageal and gastric cancer are diagnosed annually, and 1.1 million deaths are attributed to this disease



Слайд 3 Advanced disease- aim of treatment
Prolong survival/progression free

Advanced disease- aim of treatment Prolong survival/progression free survivalPalliation/symptom control Improve/preserve quality of life (QoL)

survival

Palliation/symptom control

Improve/preserve quality of life (QoL)


Слайд 4 Single Agents Active in Gastric Cancer
5-fluorouracil (UFT,Capecitabine)
S1
Cisplatin
Doxorubicin/Epirubicin
Paclitaxel
Docetaxel
Irinotecan

Van

Single Agents Active in Gastric Cancer5-fluorouracil (UFT,Capecitabine)S1CisplatinDoxorubicin/EpirubicinPaclitaxel DocetaxelIrinotecanVan De Velde, Kelsen D…Gastric cancer.2008

De Velde, Kelsen D…Gastric cancer.2008


Слайд 5 Combination Regimens vs. Best Supportive Care

Small studies
4 trials

Combination Regimens vs. Best Supportive CareSmall studies4 trials showing improved survival

showing improved survival of 4-8 months with combined chemotherapy


Scheithauer et al. 1995 ELF vs. BSC

Pyrhonen et al. 1995 FEMTX vs. BSC

Glimelius et al. 1997 ELF vs. BSC

Murad et al. 1999 FAMTX vs. BSC
QOL reported to be better



Слайд 6

Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A

Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Aggregate Data

Anna D. Wagner, Wilfried Grothe, Johannes Haerting, Gerhard Kleber, Axel Grothey, Wolfgang E. Fleig

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 18 (June 20), 2006: pp. 2903-2909

Слайд 7
Effect of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC)

Effect of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC) on overall survival

on overall survival


Слайд 8
Effect of combination versus single-agent chemotherapy on overall

Effect of combination versus single-agent chemotherapy on overall survivalDoxorubiciSA

survival
DoxorubiciSA


Слайд 9 Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/cisplatin

Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/cisplatin combinations (without anthracyclines)

combinations (without anthracyclines)


Слайд 10 Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/anthracycline

Effect of fluorouracil (FU)/cisplatin (P)/anthracycline combinations versus FU/anthracycline combinations (without cisplatin)

combinations (without cisplatin)


Слайд 11 Toxicity
PELF; 184 patients :
cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin,

ToxicityPELF; 184 patients : cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin, and FU bolusECF; 327

and FU bolus
ECF; 327 patients:
epirubicin, cisplatin, and

FU cont.
The rate of treatment-related deaths was 3.3% for PELF versus 0.6% for ECF (OR = 5.36; 95% CI, 1.1 to 27.4; Fisher's exact test,
P = .02834

Quality of life was analyzed in two studies evaluating ECF compared with FU, doxorubicin, and methotrexate and mitomycin, cisplatin, and FU and was superior in patients treated with ECF.

Слайд 12 Outcomes From Phase III Trials

Outcomes From Phase III Trials

Слайд 13 Reference protocol
ECF

CF

Cisplatin/5-FU (CF) and

Reference protocolECFCF	  Cisplatin/5-FU (CF) and ECF (epirubicin plus CF) regimens

ECF (epirubicin plus CF) regimens have been investigated

widely in clinical studies and were until recently presented as the reference regimens.

Слайд 14
Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens

Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens

Слайд 15 Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens
Bouché O, Raoul

Effect of irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing regimens Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain

JL, Bonnetain F, et al: Randomized multicenter phase II

trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: A Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive Group study-FFCD 9803. J Clin Oncol 22:4319-4328, 2004
Moehler M, Eimermacher A, Siebler J, et al: Randomized phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) versus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 92:2122-2128, 2005
Dank M, Zaluski J, Valvere V, et al: Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT 11) + 5- FU/folinic acid (FA) vs CDDP + 5-FU in first line advanced gastric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:308s, 2005 (suppl 16, abstr 4003)
Irinotecan-containing regimens exhibit a benefit in survival of approximately 1 month and a lower rate of treatment-related deaths over the reference regimen, which was FU and cisplatin in two of three studies.

Слайд 16
CPT-11 plus Cisplatin in patients with

CPT-11 plus Cisplatin in patients with advanced, untreated gastric or

advanced, untreated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma Results of a

Phase II study
A. Ajani, M.D., Jackie Baker, R.N, …
65 mg/m2 CPT-11 plus 30 mg/m2 cisplatin, both administered intravenously 1 day per week for 4 consecutive weeks


Median TTP - 24 weeks

Median survival - 9 months (range, 1-23+ months).

Слайд 17 IF vs. CF phase III, 337 pts Dank et.

IF vs. CF phase III, 337 pts Dank et. al, Ann

al, Ann Oncol. 2008
Arm A
Irinotecan (80mg/m2) D1
LV (500mg/m2) D1
5FU

(2,000mg/m2) CIVI 22hrs
Cycle weekly for 6/7 weeks

Arm B
Cisplatin (100mg/m2) D1
5FU (1000mg/m2) CIVI
D1-5
cycle q28 days


97% metastatic
No palliative/prior treatment within 12 months
Baseline characteristics with slightly worse PS in IF arm


Слайд 18

Dank et al, ASCO 2005

Dank et al, ASCO 2005


Слайд 19
Dank et al, ASCO 2005

Dank et al, ASCO 2005

Слайд 20 IF vs. CF


Potential alternative therapy

IF vs. CF Potential alternative therapy

Слайд 21 Taxotere
Final results of a

Taxotere  Final results of a randomized controlled phase III trial

randomized controlled phase III trial (TAX 325) comparing docetaxel

(T) combined with cisplatin (C) and 5-fluorouracil (F) to CF in patients (pts) with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (MGC).
Moiseyenko VM, Ajani J, Tjulandin SA, et al.
J Clin Oncol 23:308s, 2005 (suppl 16, abstr 4002)




Слайд 22 TAX 325
Arm A
D 75mg/m2 D1
C 75mg/m2 D1
F 750mg/m2

TAX 325 Arm AD 75mg/m2 D1C 75mg/m2 D1F 750mg/m2 CIVI

CIVI D1-5
cycles q21 days
Arm B

C 100mg/m2 D1
F 1000mg/m2

CIVI D105
cycles q28 days

International Phase III
457 chemotherapy-naive patients
Median age 55
97% had metastatic disease
Patient characteristics well balanced


Слайд 23 TAX 325
Median survival, 9.2 v 8.6

TAX 325  Median survival, 9.2 v 8.6 month

month

The small survival advantage for DCF

compared with cisplatin and FU observed in this randomized phase III study, although statistically significant (median survival, 9.2 v 8.6 months, respectively P = .02), seems to be of questionable clinical relevance in the light of a considerably increased toxicity, especially in patients older than 65 years of age.

Слайд 24
Initially:
Docetaxel - 50 mg/m2 Cisplatin 50

Initially: Docetaxel - 50 mg/m2 Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1,

mg/m2 on days 1, 15 and 29
Leucovorin

500 mg/m2 and Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36, every 8 weeks (1 cycle)

The doses were amended to:
Docetaxel 40 mg/m2, Cisplatin 40 mg/m2, LCV 200 mg/m2, and Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 after treatment of the first 15 patients.


Слайд 26
2x2 randomized study comparing ECF to

2x2 randomized study comparing ECF to  alternative regimens substituting Oxaliplatin

alternative regimens substituting Oxaliplatin for Cisplatin

Capecitabine for 5-fluorouracil.

ECF (E 50mg/m2); (C 60mg/m2); (FU 200mg/m2)
EOF (E 50mg/m2); (O 130mg/m2); (FU 200mg/m2)
ECX (E 50mg/m2); (C 60mg/m2); (X 1000/1250mg/m2)
EOX (E 50mg/m2); (O 130mg/m2); (X 1000/1250mg/m2)

Cycles q21 days


Слайд 27 REAL-2
The 2x2 comparisons primarily compared the fluoropyridine-containing arms

REAL-2 The 2x2 comparisons primarily compared the fluoropyridine-containing arms (ECF +

(ECF + EOF versus ECX + EOX) and platinum-containing

arms (ECF + ECX versus EOF + EOX).

Слайд 28 REAL-2
For the fluoropyrimidine comparison

REAL-2   For the fluoropyrimidine comparison of 5-FU versus capecitabine:

of
5-FU versus capecitabine:
1 y OS -

39.4% (median OS 9.6 months) versus 44.6% (median OS 10.9 months) (HR:0.86 (95% CI:0.75-0.99))

Слайд 29 REAL-2
For the platinum comparison

REAL-2   For the platinum comparison of cisplatin versus oxaliplatin:

of cisplatin versus oxaliplatin:
1 y OS -

40.1% (median OS 10.0 months) versus 43.9% (median OS 10.4 months)
(HR:0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-1.05

Слайд 30 REAL-2 conclusion
capecitabine is not inferior to 5-FU and oxaliplatin

REAL-2 conclusioncapecitabine is not inferior to 5-FU and oxaliplatin is not

is not inferior to cisplatin in the first-line treatment

of oesophago-gastric cancers.

In a comparison of survival by regimen, the median overall survival for ECF, EOF, ECX and EOX was 9.9, 9.3, 9.9 and 11.2 months respectively.
EOX was associated with a significantly better median OS compared to ECF (p=0.02).

Слайд 31 n engl j med 358;1 www.nejm.38 org january

n engl j med 358;1 www.nejm.38 org january 3, 2008Capecitabine and

3, 2008
Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil

and cisplatin,respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer.

table


Слайд 32 Metastatic disease ongoing phase III trials:
United States:

Metastatic disease ongoing phase III trials: United States:   cisplatin/S-1

cisplatin/S-1 vs. cisplatin/5FU
28 day cycles
S-1

given daily 21/28 days

Japanese: Trials with S-1,RAD001
German: Irinotecan vs. BSC

Слайд 33 HER2 positive gastric cancer:
ToGA trial is

HER2 positive gastric cancer:  ToGA trial is an ongoing Phase

an ongoing Phase III, randomised, open-label, multicentre study evaluating

the efficacy and safety of Herceptin in combination with a fluoropyrimidine (Xeloda or 5-fluorouracil at the investigator’s discretion) and cisplatin versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Слайд 34 ToGA trial design
HER2-positive advanced GC (n=584)



5-FU or capecitabinea +

ToGA trial designHER2-positive advanced GC (n=584)5-FU or capecitabinea + cisplatin(n=290)R5-FU or

cisplatin
(n=290)



R
5-FU or capecitabinea + cisplatin
+ trastuzumab
(n=294)
Stratification factors
advanced vs metastatic


GC vs GEJ
measurable vs non-measurable
ECOG PS 0-1 vs 2
capecitabine vs 5-FU

Phase III, randomized, open-label, international, multicenter study
HER2 over expression – 6-35% (20%)

1Bang et al; Abstract 4556, ASCO 2009

3807 patients screened1
810 HER2-positive (22.1%)


Слайд 35 Treatment regimens
Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14 q3w x 6

5-fluorouracil

Treatment regimensCapecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14 q3w x 65-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day

800 mg/m2/day continuous iv infusion d1-5 q3w x 6

Cisplatin

80 mg/m2 q3w x 6

Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg q3w until PD

Слайд 36 ToGA
Endpoints:
Primary: overall survival
Secondary: progression-free survival

ToGA Endpoints:Primary:  overall survivalSecondary: progression-free survival PFS

PFS

overall response rate ORR
clinical benefit rate
duration of response
safety profile
quality of life
pharmacokinetics of Herceptin


Слайд 37 Results

Median OS was significantly

Results  Median OS was significantly improved with H+CT compared to

improved with H+CT compared to CT alone

13.8 vs. 11.1 mo
p=0.0048; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60, 0.91
ORR - 47.3% in the H+CT arm
34.5% in the CT arm p=0.0017
There was no difference in symptomatic congestive heart failure between arms. Asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decreases were reported in 4.6% of pts in the H+CT arm and 1.1% in the CT arm.

Слайд 38 Primary end point: OS
Time (months)
294
290
277
266
246
223
209
185
173
143
147
117
113
90
90
64
71
47
56
32
43
24
30
16
21
14
13
7
12
6
6
5
4
0
1
0
0
0
No. at risk
11.1
13.8



0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
Event
FC +

Primary end point: OSTime (months)2942902772662462232091851731431471171139090647147563243243016211413712665401000No. at risk11.113.80.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0024681012141618202224262830323436EventFC + HFCCI, confidence interval;

H
FC
CI, confidence interval; H, trastuzumab
Events
167 182
HR
0.74
95% CI
0.60, 0.91
p value
0.0046
Median OS
13.8 11.1


Слайд 39 Efficacy: OS by HER2 status



Subgroup
Median OS (months)
All
11.1
13.8
vs
Pre-planned

Efficacy: OS by HER2 statusSubgroupMedian OS  (months)All11.113.8vsPre-planned analysis IHC0/FISH+IHC1+/FISH+IHC2+/FISH+IHC3+/FISH+IHC3+/FISH-7.210.210.812.317.710.68.712.317.917.5Exploratory analysis

analysis

IHC0/FISH+
IHC1+/FISH+
IHC2+/FISH+
IHC3+/FISH+
IHC3+/FISH-
7.2
10.2
10.8
12.3
17.7
10.6
8.7
12.3
17.9
17.5
Exploratory analysis

IHC0 or 1+/FISH+
IHC2+/FISH+ or IHC3+
8.7
11.8
10.0
16.0
vs
vs



vs
vs
vs
vs
vs





0.92
1.24
0.75
0.58
0.83
0.48, 1.76
0.70,

2.20
0.51, 1.11
0.41, 0.81
0.20, 3.38

Hazard ratio

95% CI

0.74

0.60, 0.91

1.07
0.65

0.70, 1.62
0.51, 0.83

Risk ratio

Favors H

Favors no H

584

61
70
159
256
15

131
446

N


Слайд 40

Conclusions
Trastuzumab is the first biological agent to

ConclusionsTrastuzumab is the first biological agent to show a survival benefit

show a survival benefit in gastric cancer
Trastuzumab in combination

with chemotherapy is a new treatment option for patients with HER2-positive gastric adenocarcinoma



Слайд 41 Avastin…
Multicenter Phase II Study of Irinotecan,

Avastin… Multicenter Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in

Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Gastric or

Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Manish A. Shah, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, David H. Ilson, Alissa Levnor, David D'Adamo, Eileen O'Reilly, Archie Tse, Robin Trocola, Lawrence Schwartz, Marinela Capanu, Gary K. Schwartz, David P. Kelsen


Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 33 (November 20), 2006: pp. 5201-5206


Слайд 42
47 patients with metastatic or

47 patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were

unresectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg

on day 1,
irinotecan 65 mg/m2, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days.

The primary end point was to demonstrate a 50% improvement in time to progression over historical values. Secondary end points included safety, response, and survival.

Median TTP was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 9.9 months
Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95%CI, 11.3 to 17.2 months


Слайд 43 Cetuximab …
Phase II study of cetuximab in combination

Cetuximab …Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in

with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated advanced gastric or

gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FOLCETUX study). Pinto C… Annals of Oncology Advance Access December 12, 2006
ORR - 44.1%
mTTP - 8 months (95% CI 7–9).
OS - 16 months (95% CI 9–23).

The combination of cetuximab and FOLFIRI is active in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. The higher toxicity appears to be limited to neutropenia(41%)

Слайд 44 Cetuximab …
Phase II study of cetuximab in combination

Cetuximab …Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and

with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with untreated advanced

gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (DOCETUX study) Pinto C…British Journal of Cancer (October 2009)
cetuximab – 400mg/m2 - initial dose i.v., followed by weekly doses of 250m2,
cisplatin 75mg/m2 i.v. on day 1,
docetaxel 75mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles, and then cetuximab maintenance treatment was allowed in patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease.
mTTP – 5mo
mOS – 9mo
ORR – 41.2%
Not improve the TTP and OS.
The toxicity of cisplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy was not affected by the addition of cetuximab.

Слайд 45 Cetuximab …
EXPAND (Phase III)

Cetuximab (Erbitux) in combination with capecitabine

Cetuximab …EXPAND (Phase III)Cetuximab (Erbitux) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda, X)

(Xeloda, X) and cisplatin (P) versus XP alone


Слайд 46 Second line therapy
Second-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI in

Second line therapy Second-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic

patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) not previously treated

with fluoropyrimidines.
L. Di Lauro, S. I. Fattoruso, L. Giacinti …J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009

First-line therapy : epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin or oxaliplatin
Second line: irinotecan 180 mg/mq (150 mg/mq in pts >70 ys old)
day 1; leucovorin 100 mg/mq/day , bolus fluorouracil (FU) 400 mg/mq and a 22-h infusion of FU 600 mg/mq day 1-2, every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patients refusal.
Endpoints : response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and safety.


Слайд 47
Median TTP - 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.1)

Median TTP - 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.1) Median OS -


Median OS - 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.7).



FOLFIRI is an active and well tolerated second-line regimen for MGC pts not previously treated with fluoropyrimidines.



Слайд 48 Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer:

Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: who may benefit?

who may benefit? V Catalano, F Graziano …British Journal of Cancer (2008)






Median survival for the whole group was 6.1 months  
1-year OS - 20.5% (95% CI, 14.4–26.6
Overall response rate of 16.0% (95% CI, 10.6–21.4  
No statistically significative difference was found between each regimen used as second-line chemotherapy.


Слайд 49 Conclusion
No dramatic improvement with new studies.
DCF with slight

ConclusionNo dramatic improvement with new studies.DCF with slight improvement, but increased

improvement, but increased toxicity
IF possible alternative for those unable

to tolerate a platinum agent
REAL-trial results with provide role for oxaliplatin and capecitabine


  • Имя файла: treatment-of-advanced-and-metastatic-gastric-cancer.pptx
  • Количество просмотров: 118
  • Количество скачиваний: 0