Business Value on a Customer Case
Use Cases & Demo
& Moscow SQM PilotGlobal References & Why HUAWEI
Content
FindSlide.org - это сайт презентаций, докладов, шаблонов в формате PowerPoint.
Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть
Content
Set of platforms / tools, services and operation support to increase Operator’s value
Content
-0.5 Mio GBP
20.2 Mio GBP
Ramp-up period
Maximal value
By additional use cases, not requested in RFP
Huawei is happy to propose / demonstrate / discuss
Content
NPS
Churn
CEM vs SQM
Persona Based Experience Assurance
Customer Care Assistance
Digitizing Customer Care
ARPU Driven Network Planning
Enterprise (B2B) Service Quality Assurance
Value-Experience Matrix Migration
Service Operation Centre
SQM Pilot Moscow
Content
Group
C
1.5 Mio
Detailed analysis and planning supported BC calculation for OPEX savings
Summary (details in further slides):
Reduction of AHT of massive network issues related calls by 15% (1 min savings per call)
Reduction of AHT of technical incident related calls by 10% (1.6 min per call)
Improved FCR by 20% by automated root cause analysis per End User
Improved SQ / CE leads to deduction of complaints by 20% with less complaints calls
Expected savings start from 1.5 Mio GBP per annum
Trouble Tickets 30%
Number of TT related Calls
Required Personnel
11.000
Staff
(CC & Retail)
Retail 8,500 (est.)
Call Centre 2,500 (est.)
AHT ~ 6.3 – 6.8 min
Marketing
Query /
Usage
Complex Issue
Incident
Call Time
6,677,196
min per year
4,928,407
min per year
+
Target
Benchmarks
Huawei expects significant savings in Call Centre by CEM Platform Implementation
Details – please see next page
Network issues calls
10%
Complaints calls
Assumed performance impact only for the 7.4% of calls
Demarcation on End User Level with pre-resolution by CEM Backend system for CC L3 will reduce technical incidents calls time by 1.6 minutes per technical incident call
How
Impacting 0.31% of all calls (only technical incidents)
20%
Network issues calls
20%
Complaints calls
Pre-automated root cause identification by CEM Backend for CC L3 helps to correlate known network issues with CE / SQ thus to reduce number of TT to NOC/SOC and to reduce time for the ticket creation
General improvement of Service Quality / Customer Experience will help to reduce potential number of complaints and will reduce number of calls
Assumed only 1.23% of all calls are related to technical
Assumed only 0.37% of all calls refer to TT creation
1.2M
0.03M
0.2M
0.07M
What
Benefits
£ 1.5 M per year
Summary (details in further slides):
Reduction of AHT by automated demarcation within the End User TT resolution
CEM Platform allows to demarcate the issue automatically
Demarcation includes demonstration of the NE in the chain
Demarcation includes statistic and status per NE
It helps to save time and not to address to many systems within the demarcation
In BC the time reduction (for demarcation only) is counted on 50% level
Expected savings start from 0.4 Mio GBP per annum
Applicable only for End User Trouble Tickets and reduces only demarcation time (it gives 13% of improvement time for the whole TT resolution time)
How
0.4M
Savings
£ 0.4 M per year
What
Summary (details in further slides):
Enterprise Monitoring and SLA Management
Automated operations by CEM Platform will allow to significantly save OPEX
Additional revenue / benefits were not counted here:
Huawei has a dedicated Use Case Enterprise Assurance
Estimation of extra revenue by UC Enterprise Assurance requires more input from EE
Huawei suggests to have a workshop with EE to estimate additional value for EE
New SLA offers for EE Enterprise Customers (per year)
SLA and KQI* visibility for CE will be given to Enterprises
BC calculation includes expenses for the network optimization to fulfill SLA
Expected savings start from 1.3 Mio GBP per annum
* KQI – Key Quality Indicator
Platforms allows to load IMSI of Enterprise and to get all locations, NE, KPI, and KQI Indicators (otherwise it would be required to find all information, address, find cells and collect manually) – here is example for 100 Enterprises is shown
Major Savings
By CEM Platform alarms will be generated automatically for every VIP / Enterprise user. No need to monitor or to check reports on a daily basis (assumed manually it requires 20 minutes per day per Enterprise – so 4 people in parallel work)
CEM Platform will generate reports automatically on a weekly / monthly with minimal efforts per employee
Approach:
Enterprise gets SQ reports
Either automated reports or online portal can be given*
Enterprise pays 5% more on a monthly basis
Assumed – 10% of customers would go for it
* CEA – Customer Experience Assurance
Outcome:
Accumulated income will be completely spent for dedicated optimization
So it will become a Service Quality Assurance approach
or
No price increase – optimization costs to be covered by benefits (See above)
Benefits:
CEA* is a strong differentiation factor for Enterprises
Such an approach can help to secure business
Either to reduce churn or to increase market share
Assumed 0.1% market share increase
Summary (details in further slides):
Smart Investments Planning Approach (Traffic / ARPU / Complaints driven)
Analysis and setting up priorities for Cell Planning / Expansion
Analysis done by ARPU, Complaints, VIP, etc
Only OPEX savings for ARPU driven Planning Process are counted
2G-3G-4G Users Migration (per year)
Identification of the users having LTE capable handset and not using LTE network
Analysis can be done either to identify users with no subscription or wrong configuration
Potential revenue increase (by 5% for 0.5% of only postpaid subscribers)
Roaming Customers Traffic-Churn reduction
Analysis of the location / hotspots where EE lose their roamers (due to insufficient coverage)
Recovery of 1.5% of roamers is considered as a benefit for the use case
Expected savings start from 2.5 Mio GBP per annum
Efficient Operations in Network Strategy and Core Support
Efficient planning, roaming support, LTE users migration
Group
N
Man days
£ 0.17M per year
By ARPU / Complaints driven Planning EE can achieve better ROI and generate new revenue streams – all those will bring extra benefits for EE, which are not presented in BC at the moment (extra bonus)
This is expected to bring min 1 Mio GBP per year
Huawei CEM Platform can demonstrate areas with last roamers activity – areas of roamers losing
Group
D
0.9 Mio
This case requires more detailed analysis dependant on number of queries
Summary (details in further slides):
Data usage and network experience details to customers via MyEE and online:
Ability for end users to query / see data usage via EE online or App
Customer Care efforts reduction due to digital channels migration
Simplification of the data queries by CC Agent by only one tool (instead of existing three)
Assumed agent can query information from IT system by 2 minutes shorter than before
Applicable only for the data query calls (assumed 1.7% of all calls)
Expected savings start from 0.9 Mio GBP per annum
* As there is no specific technical requirement in RFP for CEM tool to support MyEE or online complaint, MyEE or online complaint support is out of the proposal scope and needs further discuss with EE
How
Impacting 2% of all calls (only data usage queries)
10%
Data Query Calls
Online Portal or / and APP integrated to CEM Platform (to get query results) may help to reduce up to 10% of data usage requests
Impacting 2% of all calls (only data usage queries)
0.6M
0.29M
What
Benefits
£ 0.9 M per year
KQI/KPI
Definition
Alarm Management
Role & Auth Management
Log
System
Dashboards
Value through Use Cases for Operator’s needs
2
4G terminal locked in 2/3G subscriber
3
2/3G high traffic subscriber
5
2/3G high APRU subscriber
6
3G fall back subscriber
7
3G terminal locked
in 2G subscriber
8
No 3G contract subscriber
9
2/3G low traffic subscriber
10
3G Subscriber
11
Network optimization
Customer contact
Marketing activities
3
4G terminal locked in 2/3G subscriber
8
3G terminal locked in 2G subscriber
B
Terminal locked subscriber: 4G device model terminal locked in 2/3G network
4
No 4G contract subscriber
5
2/3G high traffic subscriber
6
2/3G high APRU subscriber
9
No 3G contract subscriber
C
Potential subscriber:Need marketing support
User Segmentation
Influence factors
Action
Network
Marketing
Terminal
Contract
Package
Terminal sales
promotion
Customer care & marketing
Package adjustment
Others
66% More Traffic Increase
PSPU capability
Device type correlated with traffic type
Segmentation base on subscriber behavior
G byte / day
36%
By Migration
800
1000
1.7 million of 2G subscribers migrated to 3G
Operator has 0 cost
Best Practice in Operator U
Background:
The right partnerships are critical for optimal roaming revenues(Best Roaming Experience and Appropriate Rate);
The operator need detailed, prioritized and actionable information to avoid roaming revenues lost;
The operator need finely solution to optimize network for increase roaming traffic
Value Proposition:
Increase roaming traffic
Fast fine and locate inbound roaming barriers
Indentify the outbound roaming destination gaps
Avoid roaming revenue lost
Detect roaming fraud behaviors
Provide proofs for controversial roaming billing settlement
Reduce MTTR of roaming issue
Real-time roaming traffic and performance monitoring
Deeply root cause analyze base on per roamers
Gain new business opportunity
Provide competitive SLA to gain more roaming partners
Up-sell promotion base on rich roaming service analysis
SEQ Analyst Platform
International Roaming Analysis
VIP Report
VIP Analysis
VIP Tracing
SQM
VIP Care
Customer Care
Churn Predict
NPS Analysis
CEI
VIP Subscriber
Location Map
VIP Subscriber
Failure Alert
CS Service : Voice, SMS
PS Service : MMS, Web, WAP, Streaming, Email …
VIP Group CS and PS Service Quality monitoring
Experience Insight
Discover VIP’s service abnormity within 1 minute
CEI – Customer Experience Indicator
Do you already cover complete Customer Journey for your CEM?
Some Touch Points examples
User GGG
User HHH
User PPP
User AAA
How many users at this moment stuck in Activation or waiting for Trouble Resolution?
What is the real most concerned factor for majority of Users?
Have you got a system to see CEI for all Touch Points?
Report Example:
First Page visit
Purchase rate
Abandoning page
etc
Happy customers:
User XXX
User YYY
User ZZZ
User XYZ
YouTube?
Aggregation in the touch point level and in the user level
Merge of subjective and objective to have real CEI
Objective (experience) + Subjective (expectations)
Business driven by Customer Experience
Service
Centricity
User
CEM is a new way of Business in Digital Telco World
Enhanced operation + Traditional SOC
User Experience
Oriented operation
What to do?
Detailed view on Promoters and Detractors with particular step(s) for every group
Why I cannot make a call?
Why tariffs are so complex?
Why Web loading time is so long?
How can I check my balance?
≠
≠
Pattern Recognition
Mass Application
Predictive NPS Score
Outcome
Geo-Map, Table, Top users / cells
Fast response
Pro-active care
Digital Channels
Communication & Resolution
Personalized services
Omni Channels
Innovative
Personalization &
Empathy
0 - 2
Actions
NPS Group
3 - 4
5 - 6
7 - 8
9-10
From Stable Performance
to Excellent Quality
User Oriented Operation
Best Network &
Best Operator
Usage
Time
Transition
Point
Real Churn
Point
Churn Point
Recognized
By System
User decides to leave
Golden Period
Transition Period
Fake Living Period
Experience
Attitude
Behavior
Change operator
Source: China Unicom SH
HUAWEI Churn Prediction Solution Highlight
MOT Design 2: Various personalized retention offers for personas
Channel & Time
Inside-out Channel & Timing Allocation
MOT design 3: Outside-in preferred channel & time allocation
Current Value
Potential Value
Influence
Value Chaser
Entertainer
Socializer
Business Elite
Family Focused
Heavy User
persona
root cause
*IPR apply processing
Marketing Closed Loop
- Retention Process Consulting Enriched By Analytics
Source: China Unicom SH
Precision Rate : 77.0%
Recall Rate : 49.1%
Warning Period : 4 Months advance
Network
Closed loop
Marketing
Closed loop
SQDT
SQDT
(User & Service Impact)
User & Service Impact Request
Verification
Override TT with Service Impact information from SQDT
Create new TT and correlate with SQDT
Ticket Exists
No
Yes
Prioritize Ticket based on Service Impact
Before
After
11.01
12.01
Nov
Sep
Oct
01.13
09.01
May
05.01
We Are Here
10.01
Training
MGF Test
Dec
Cutover
Cutover got started on Apr 18, almost done, data check work didn’t start before project got stopped
Power-on & 3.1 Upgrade
Suspended
Jan
Feb
01.01
MegaFon requested to have preliminary trial results by end of Oct. 2016
It’s proposed to focus on Use Case 1 Complaint Handling delivery for phase 1, due to limited time left for delivery
3.1 upgrade is completed
UC 2 Implementation & Verification
MGF Test
UC 3 Implementation & Verification
MGF Test
UC 4 Implementation & Verification
MGF Test
UC 5 Implementation & Verification
MGF Test
Data Check
02.01
Выполненные работы
Текущие и запланированные работы